• To: <martind@n...>,"'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@i...>,"'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:34:43 +0100
• In-reply-to: <000001c5685d$ffdda450$ca01a8c0@DIDIERHOME>
• Thread-index: AcVoYTRjuwMUVnivQFaxDiBx/OcbcwAyjksg

> I also hope that in
> a closer future we finally get out of the dark ages and the 
> actual mainframe
> centric architecture connected to dumb terminals (something we call a
> browser).

And there was me, thinking that the industry had regained its sanity after
the crazy and unsuccessful experiment called "client-server computing"!

(The reality, of course, is that there's room for both...)

Michael Kay

• References:
  • RE: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Another Microsoft XML patent
• Next by Date: RE: Another Microsoft XML patent
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread