• To: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Subject: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:41:58 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200506020736.31617.david.lyon@c...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206FA3@h...> <200506020736.31617.david.lyon@c...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)

David Lyon wrote:

> The more complex and slow xml becomes, the greater 
> the demand for xml burocrats and academics, to explain
> things that were once so simple.

I've seen no evidence of XML becoming slower over time. (Note the 
comparative.) On the contrary, both Moore's law and improved algorithms 
and software have contributed to faster processing of XML. XML's a lot 
faster today that it was eight years ago, and it was fast enough for a 
lot of use cases then.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• References:
  • Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath question with regards to Schematron rule
• Next by Date: Re: Faster XML (was: Why XML for Messaging?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Faster XML (encryption, compression, web services)
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread