• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
• From: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@g...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:00:38 +1000
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=g3VjF1ELpFq96L9lK2I0bHT7Nk6o471cFSwj27m+HiCC7Ye06rgA5KwrWx3IIGuHlvKlPzdsIJNDg3aNMv+uGbwg6LWGaLi3Pe/XmYWaDNHvevoLlzjyZDmPn9JlUG9/JOLaRvX/jfS9VVpLJmM+j+Zio+qIoaBpOC1AJvUK/zM=
• In-reply-to: <1120002122.8745.23.camel@l...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072070BF@h...> <1120002122.8745.23.camel@l...>
• Reply-to: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@g...>

On 6/29/05, Geoffrey Shuetrim <geoff@g...> wrote:
> XLink is pretty aggressively used by XBRL (extensible business reporting
> language - http://www.xbrl.org/ ).  

For what it is worth, Topic Maps XTM also uses XLink, albeit 1.0 uses
it purely as a URL while 1.1 uses a bit more of it.


Alex
-- 
"Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know."
                                                         - Frank Herbert
__ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • XML Digital Signature
    • From: "Roshan Mani" <roshanmani@s...>

• References:
  • Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
    • From: Geoffrey Shuetrim <geoff@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
• Next by Date: XML Digital Signature
• Previous by thread: Re: Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
• Next by thread: XML Digital Signature
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread