Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
It isn't fast enough when used wall-to-wall. I read about tuning parsers, etc., but if I am doing that, I am not using off-the-shelf COTS. So why bother? I'll bet a beer: when we finally get Longhorn and look under the covers, we'll discover MS optimized the blazes out of some XML pieces by subsetting it and being very persnickety about substitutions. To be fair, for a lot of XML applications, none of this matters. For applications for which it does matter, we're on our own. That can be ok, because as Rich pointed out, we get to choose. As long as we are doing that, we may want to use another syntax for messaging too. Still, what will replace XML? What will it look like? Is it hiding in the tall grass or is it laying on the shelf at Sun? It's a fun question. len From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...] Why not?
|
