• To: <xml-dev@l...> <xml-dev@l...> <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Question on XSD validator
• From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
• Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:13:05 +0300
• In-reply-to: <200505181726.j4IHQLft016979@u...>
• References: <200505181726.j4IHQLft016979@u...>

On May 18, 2005, at 20:19, Michael Kay wrote:

> By contrast, XML Spy uses its own schema processor, which is not 
> always 100% conformant with the spec.

Has anyone systematically surveyed the conformance of various XSD 
validator implementations? Is there a comparison table somewhere on the 
Web?

I have often seen--as in this thread--various qualifications suggesting 
that a particular implementation is not 100% conformant or is partial, 
etc. Xerces claims fullness but I've been told it doesn't implement the 
latest errata.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@i...
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Question on XSD validator
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Question on XSD validator
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Validating against the correct root element using library schemas
• Next by Date: RE: Question on XSD validator
• Previous by thread: Re: Question on XSD validator
• Next by thread: Re: Question on XSD validator
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread