Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
This > 2) To reply to David(2): Vector models are informative. There is a lot we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail. Discussions of the models can open up innovation. It's always worth discussing. is worth discussing... This > David Lyon <david.lyon@c...> is not. On 5/2/05, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote: > 1) To reply to David(1): I don't think that, but it seemed a waste of time > > to put tags around it or more smilies. OTOH, black boxes are a pretty good > place to hide bad processes. Simply hooking up SOAs won't change that. > The idea that Sarbanes-Oxley is amenable to SOA is interesting. If ever > there was an architectural challenge, that is one. > > 2) To reply to David(2): Vector models are informative. There is a lot > we can do without XML such as is being done with your gmail. Discussions > of the models can open up innovation. It's always worth discussing. > > So kill the chicken AND the duck. Keep the meat. > > len > > From: M. David Peterson [mailto:m.david.x2x2x@g...] > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 5:24 PM > > I'll chip in a hundred just to kill this thread right here and now... > -- <M:D/> :: M. David Peterson :: XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist
|
