• To: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>
• Subject: Re: Well-established uses of processing instructions?
• From: Bill Humphries <bill@w...>
• Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:37:43 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505081923130.20291@r...>
• References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505081923130.20291@r...>

On May 8, 2005, at 7:32 PM, Vladimir Gapeyev wrote:

>  I am more interested in those that have a "community"
> around them (manifesting itself by a de jure or a de facto  
> standard, or
> multiple applications that understand the PI, or large amount of  
> document
> instances with unrelated authorship) rather than in made-up samples,
> however plausible they are.  Any pointers?

Wouldn't <?php ... ?> be the most widely deployed?

Most instances don't have the strict-PI rule turned on, so <? ... ?>,  
but it's there.

-- whump

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Well-established uses of processing instructions?
    • From: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>

• References:
  • Well-established uses of processing instructions?
    • From: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Well-established uses of processing instructions?
• Next by Date: RE: Well-established uses of processing instructions?
• Previous by thread: Re: Well-established uses of processing instructions?
• Next by thread: Re: Well-established uses of processing instructions?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread