• To: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@y...>
• Subject: Re: attribute order
• From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>
• Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 16:43:07 +0100
• Cc: XML List Developers <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <20050508162521.64421.qmail@w...>
• References: <20050508162521.64421.qmail@w...>

Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Now I realize, that mapping XML model(using element
> containership and attributes) to OO paradigm is not
> quite appropriate.. For trivial examples, we may do
> so. But we cannot generalize this correspondence..

You can't generalise it to all XML documents, no. But if you simply 
want to find an XML format that is capable of completely representing 
an existing object model, you might like to have a look at XMI:

   http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/xmi.htm
-- 
Chris Burdess

• References:
  • Re: attribute order
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Principles of XML design
• Next by Date: Re: attribute order
• Previous by thread: Re: attribute order
• Next by thread: Re: attribute order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread