• To: 'Rich Salz' <rsalz@d...>, 'Michael Kay' <mike@s...>
• Subject: RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:32:04 -0500
• Cc: 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@d...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>

Bottom line, Rich, is I have to have this 
soon for major projects.   LZW can get 
us by, but if the W3C can't prove it or 
make up it's mind, standardization for 
this goes elsewhere.  As Michael said, 
we'll just do it.

len


From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]

> Bottom line: they can't make their minds up.

Disagree.  I'd summarize it as
	Bottom line:  prove it

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
• Next by Date: RE: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
• Previous by thread: Re: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
• Next by thread: Re: TAG opinion on XML Binary Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread