• To: Richard Tobin <richard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Principles of XML design
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 02:47:29 +0900
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20050506170322.498F52A46A2@m...>
• References: <20050506170322.498F52A46A2@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Richard Tobin wrote:
> To invent a document format in which the order of
> attributes is significant and then claim that it conforms to XML would
> be misleading to say the least, since it would not be interoperable with
> the majority of XML tools (which don't preserve attribute order).
> 
> You can of course construct even more egregious examples, such as a
> format in which data is encoded by the number of spaces between
> attributes.  That isn't XML.

Which begs the question: if XML is not what is described in the XML 
specification (any edition of any version, refined and/or complemented 
by any other specification), then what /is/ XML?

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/

• References:
  • Re: Principles of XML design
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: Re: Principles of XML design
• Next by Date: Re: Principles of XML design
• Previous by thread: Re: Principles of XML design
• Next by thread: Re: Principles of XML design
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread