Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Micah Dubinko wrote: > I hope this doesn't come across as flippant, but how about Relax NG? > > Or how about trang converting to Relax NG and back to XSD? > > .micah > Not flippant at all. It might be a good approach for some things. My current thinking is that you would need proxy tools which both rewrite the schema to suit the capabilities of the client and rewrite the documents accordingly, to the smallest extent possible. For example, a client system that does not allow recursion: either you need to add ranking to names (alpha-lifting: shades of SGML!) or you need to flatten the document (and therefore need a linking or key arrangement.) Perhaps vendors should be encouraged more to clearly state the limits to the conformance of their main products pages: We don't support wildcards. We don't support xsi':type We don't support elements-in-elements We don't enforce unambiguity etc. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
