• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Processor treatment of entities
• From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 06:56:29 -0400
• In-reply-to: <425B7967.8040802@s...>

At 2005-04-12 02:31 -0500, Jack Matheson wrote:
>In section 4.4 of the XML specification, a distinction is made between 
>entities referenced in attribute values

<bar acronym="AT&amp;T"/>

>and entities occurring as attribute values.

<!NOTATION gif SYSTEM "">
<!ENTITY foo SYSTEM "../../images/foo.gif" NDATA gif>
....
<figure image="foo"/>

>Can anyone explain this difference to me?

I hope the above distinction helps.  Unparsed entities can only be 
referenced as attribute values ... since they aren't parsed, they cannot be 
referenced as a parsed entity as in &foo;.

An unparsed entity's relative URI is resolved to an absolute URI based on 
the location of the entity declaration in either the internal or an 
external declaration subset.  In XSLT using unparsed-entity-uri() will get 
you the absolute URI.  This is very helpful in publishing when managing the 
locations of graphic files being referenced for XSL-FO engines.

I don't see many of my students having used unparsed entities, though, when 
I cover this topic in class.

I hope this helps.

........................... Ken

--
World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training.
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@C...
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Breast Cancer Awareness  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

• References:
  • Processor treatment of entities
    • From: Jack Matheson <jack@s...>

• Prev by Date: Processor treatment of entities
• Next by Date: RE: Are URIs Resources? (WAS RE: Re: Non-infoset)
• Previous by thread: Processor treatment of entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread