• To: Matthew Terenzio <matt@j...>
• Subject: Re: XLINK support in browsers
• From: Razvan MIHAIU <mihaiu@m...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 21:26:48 +0300
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <b7a10d568b0ba6b4606b435aa50965d6@j...>
• References: <424D1BDD.7060404@m...> <b7a10d568b0ba6b4606b435aa50965d6@j...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Matthew Terenzio wrote:

>
> On Apr 1, 2005, at 5:01 AM, Razvan MIHAIU wrote:
>
>> Is there any browser that supports the XLINK
>
>
> Xlink doesn't seem to be or have been that actively pursued. Many 
> wonder if it, or a successor, will ever actually happen in a 
> meaningful way.

    What's wrong with XLINK ? At first sight it seems to be quite powerful.


Regards,
Razvan

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XLINK support in browsers
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • XLINK support in browsers
    • From: Razvan MIHAIU <mihaiu@m...>
  • Re: XLINK support in browsers
    • From: Matthew Terenzio <matt@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: all group composition
• Next by Date: Re: (OT) Infinite email storage
• Previous by thread: Re: XLINK support in browsers
• Next by thread: RE: XLINK support in browsers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread