• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tierand Clients
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 00:18:03 -0700
• In-reply-to: <e3a5cb2c0504212046bb67053@m...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206E69@h...> <4266C654.2010005@d...> <2844.203.164.53.179.1114058426.squirrel@i...> <001601c5468d$f38e75e0$1601a8c0@DURANTE> <42686032.2030401@o...> <000401c546e5$c2d56ff0$1601a8c0@DURANTE> <e3a5cb2c0504212046bb67053@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Michael Champion wrote:

> I just want to hear people's use cases and come to a better-informed
> opinion on whether XSLT 1.0 or 2.0 does the job for them, whether
> XQuery does it better, or whether we need something altogether
> different (perhaps along the lines of E4X or C-Omega).

Agreed. Although after hearing more about the methodology involved, I'm 
even more skeptical than ever about market surveys...

-- Ron

• References:
  • RE: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tier and Clients
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tier and Clients
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
  • Re: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tier and Clients
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
  • Re: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tier and Clients
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: URI Design
• Previous by thread: Re: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tier and Clients
• Next by thread: Re: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread