• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
• From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:16:33 -0400
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cCk8zHEPFLsj87ug8+lBzoB3L1tknBbX7vBnQ1iY7reJzjvKO9/1cp9CSu39VFsOWunvqxdFnUjiY69Heo5iwOGwAVZb6cDP8X+3O8s3cfwIih5P3Cpk29zgHgF7kV51X96vKv8DpUOM4k+477quTFO4GT29MT6gETFwHlH6mF4=
• In-reply-to: <e3a5cb2c05041814026d7527d2@m...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206E4F@h...> <e3a5cb2c05041814026d7527d2@m...>
• Reply-to: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

On 4/18/05, Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...> wrote:

> 
> That's our position.

By that I mean it's my position, and I think it's Michael Rys
position.  I don't speak for MS in any official capacity on this, and
our minds are wide-open to actual evidence that a standard binary XML
format could be fast, small, support XQuery, be better for SOAP than
XML is, support generic well-formed  XML somehow, and do all that well
enough to make the disruption worthwhile.

• References:
  • RE: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
• Next by Date: RE: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
• Next by thread: RE: XML-enabled databases, XQuery APIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread