• To: 'Michael Champion' <michaelc.champion@g...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand model of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:54:31 -0600

xml:mustUnderstand="log(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
it understands the message fragment.

The recipient is free to imagine it understands the message fragment 
and blog the results as affirmation.

len


From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@g...]

On Apr 1, 2005 9:31 AM, Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...> wrote:
> Excellent, an enumeration is the right way to go with this. The advantage
> is that you can then dip into negative numbers:
> 
> xml:mustUnderstand="-1" - The recipient MUST NOT understand
> the message fragment.

xml:mustUnderstand="sqrt(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
it understands the message fragment.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand mode l of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)
    • From: Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Problem parsing XML file with Xerces-J
• Next by Date: Re: Problem parsing XML file with Xerces-J
• Previous by thread: RE: REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand model of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)
• Next by thread: Re: REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand mode l of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread