• To: "Marc Gratacos" <MGratacos@i...>
• Subject: Re: xsd:redefine issue using xsd:include
• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:56:11 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B7C16C1424A7CE40981DA74035F88A8095F66B@h...> (MarcGratacos's message of "Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:10:47 -0400")
• References: <B7C16C1424A7CE40981DA74035F88A8095F66B@h...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security ThroughObscurity, linux)

"Marc Gratacos" <MGratacos@i...> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I have three schema files a.xsd, b.xsd, c.xsd within the same namespace.
>
> a.xsd includes b.xsd (<xsd:include schemaLocation="b.xsd"/>)
>
> c.xsd redefines some types from a.xsd (<xsd:redefine
> schemaLocation="a.xsd">)
>
> Since a.xsd is including b.xsd I was thinking that in c.xsd I could
> redefine types from a.xsd also. I did that and xerces doesn't complain
> at all. However, other tools like Stylus Studio, XML Spy, IBM Schema
> Quality Checker do. Is this w3c valid? It's not clear to me reading the
> spec. Or is it a tools issue?

Sounds OK to me - did you try XSV [1] ?

ht

[1] http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/xsv-status.html
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• References:
  • xsd:redefine issue using xsd:include
    • From: "Marc Gratacos" <MGratacos@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSV schema validation error: "violation of constraints onexponents"
• Next by Date: Re: The Rising Sun: How XML Binary Restored the Fortunes of Innovators
• Previous by thread: RE: xsd:redefine issue using xsd:include
• Next by thread: XQuery/XSLT drafts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread