Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
* Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...> [2005-04-27 22:48]:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 19:55 -0400, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> > When a site is not updated at all for five years, and the
> > e-mail addresses attached to the site are unresponsive, then
> > XUpdate both looks and sounds like an "abandoned" duck.
>
> [...]
>
> > > I am concerned about one thing. XUpdate needs a usable mailing
> > > list. I'm at least grateful to this thread for making me think
> > > about that. I certainly have no stake in XUpdate, but I like it
> > > enough that maybe I should...
> >
> > I set one up last year at xupdate@e... and it should still
> > be up and running.
> Well, since the topic comes up again, what I have to say about it is
> here:
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/6935
> I did find that a lot of the implementations still point to the old/dead
> site in their docs. And I admit I do see how that gives people some
> reason for thinking the project is dead.
> I hope I've demonstrated that it isn't. We'll see if we can't make that
> fact the more clear.
Thanks for this. Good resource.
--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@e...
- http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html
- http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml
|
