[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> >The key is that we have a formal means of > >annotating the relationship between the master and the derived. In this > >way we can design our processing pipeline to deal with whatever > >constraints are appropriate at any stage. As long as people follow the > >business rule that the universe of valid documents for any derived > >schema is a subset of the universe of valid documents for the > >corresponding master schema, it all works very well indeed. The problem > >is that code review is the only way we have to enforce this rule. Is the "formal means of annotating the relationship" through peer code review? Or am I missing something... -- Thanks, Charles Woerner Integration Engineer Ensenda, Inc.
|

Cart



