[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: Re: REST, SOAP, Speech Acts and the mustUnderstand model of SOA communications (was: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?)
  • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:41:34 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=E0a2ac6NeZlka3c7Q1f9opDJXbMX7x8SRgxakLszRyrwAaqwawHROXjyOAtpKrmULNJ19YVnMGxnlvlyjozcx67iVTxfUxz8zhndMVnh7bJF8qkSOeFL9aqK/aSniDzypyYWZy50edd2iXXbykLG0Ye0G6i0csp8Z7ROtwgmZvk=
  • In-reply-to: <3f1451f5050401063170a4fbda@m...>
  • References: <424CF661.2010003@p...> <3f1451f5050401063170a4fbda@m...>
  • Reply-to: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

On Apr 1, 2005 9:31 AM, Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...> wrote:
> Excellent, an enumeration is the right way to go with this. The advantage
> is that you can then dip into negative numbers:
> 
> xml:mustUnderstand="-1" - The recipient MUST NOT understand
> the message fragment.


xml:mustUnderstand="sqrt(-1)" - The recipient is free to imagine that
it understands the message fragment.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member