• To: "'Bob Foster'" <bob@o...>
• Subject: RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:31:19 +0100
• Cc: "'Gregor'" <iamgregor@g...>,"'Rick Jelliffe'" <ricko@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <426FB544.6020602@o...>
• Thread-index: AcVLQSN4IDj9elcVQK+XPhPE8TYzUgABPdlQ

> 
> How do you know it's 98% conformant? Or more generally, how 
> can one know 
> a given processor is xx% conformant? That would certainly move this 
> discussion out of the hand-waving stage.

Of course any number is arm-waving. If one had a set of conformance tests,
one could say how many of the tests are passed; but even then that doesn't
exactly correlate to how much of the specification has been implemented.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: XSD spec question
• Previous by thread: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by thread: ANN: Launch of worlds first Simple XML based Accounting System : ceBit Sydney 2005
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread