• To: "'Razvan MIHAIU'" <mihaiu@m...>, "'G. Ken Holman'" <gkholman@C...>
• Subject: RE: Quiz: XML flexibility
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:44:08 -0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <20050228000528.an90dj2sldtwgkos@w...>
• Thread-index: AcUdGLrHGLWtzvioSeOtAb2DsN/fJAADSBEg

>     I will try to clarify the question. The answer from this 
> quiz suggests that
> flexibility can only be achieved by using mixed content 
> models. Should I just
> discard this (as Michael Kay suggested) or there is some true 
> behind this
> affirmation ?

I would define "high flexibility" as "low cost of changing the sending and
receiving applications when the structure of the message changes". I don't
see how using mixed content contributes to this. But perhaps the examiner
had a different meaning in mind.

 
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: Quiz: XML flexibility
    • From: Razvan MIHAIU <mihaiu@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Quiz: XML flexibility
• Next by Date: Re: Quiz: XML flexibility
• Previous by thread: Re: Quiz: XML flexibility
• Next by thread: Re: Quiz: XML flexibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread