• To: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Subject: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:42:49 -0500
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <42149A29.3050507@p...>
• References: <E1D1lMG-0002Gf-00@u...> <42149A29.3050507@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

Bill de hÓra wrote:

> I don't seem to be getting all the mail in this thread, but to whomever 
> said that, please count me out of your consensus.
> 

My apologies. I think the thread accidentally went off list into private 
mail for a time.

Would you like to step up and defend Source as the appropriate level of 
abstraction?

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• References:
  • RE: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by Date: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Previous by thread: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by thread: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread