• To: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:43:59 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <0753f66d6e9aa594868001d795bf7d03@l...>

> The only compelling reason for a binary standard would be if the
> cost/benefit ratio is appropriate to begin with. Which boils down to
> "how much faster? And perhaps, how much smaller?" vs. "how much
> additional complexity and pain does it cause". Until those questions
> are answered with prototypes and hard data, argueing remains handwaving
> speculative FUD, and no reasonable opinion can be formed either way.

Perhaps you should look at what the XML Binary Characterization WG is
doing, then.  (Between karaoke practice, that is. :)

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
    • From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: extrernal entities - part 2
• Next by Date: Re: extrernal entities - part 2
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread