• To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Subject: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:57:01 -0800
• Cc: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20050204204803.GA31024@t...>
• References: <6.0.0.22.0.20050204222038.02251d70@p...> <20050204204803.GA31024@t...>
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

> At present, there's no apparent activity targeted toward providing an
> alternate entity-definition mechanism.

Maybe XInclude? I guess it would depend on the use case...

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• References:
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Previous by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread