• To: graybeal@m...
• Subject: Re: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:27:16 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p06020406be3929f8cd23@[134.89.13.14]> (message from JohnGraybeal on Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:10:39 -0800)
• References: <p06020406be3929f8cd23@[134.89.13.14]>

> I believe there is no straightforward way to specify this, 

I think you can do this (dtd syntax) although whether or not that is
straightforward I leave for others to judge. (If I got this wrong, which
is possible, something not unlike this will do you what you want.

optional_element2*, 
(
 (required_element,optional_element2*,(optional_element1,optional_element2*)?) |
 (optional_element1,optional_element2*, required_element,optional_element2* )
)

obligatory comment that it's all so much easier in relax ng:-)


David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

• References:
  • choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
    • From: John Graybeal <graybeal@m...>

• Prev by Date: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• Next by Date: Re: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• Previous by thread: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• Next by thread: Re: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread