• To: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Subject: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:53:27 -0600
• Cc: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bRQMrpYu1RWE+zwKMfc31vCurNJrW7h8NrGaUDw3OVJI0QhwqyE6MvDTiDH/cjVzxJ5lA7Kft3A0Ajij/LJWdinvNUKuDbKELXAUHPK3tK4pEeWaXEumWRmxy7ZrI8UtADA0/iv2UCDR+dRkAzQZkLQddRjPSfEdG/W0tNNcM8c=
• In-reply-to: <4203ED67.9090905@k...>
• References: <6.0.0.22.0.20050204222038.02251d70@p...> <20050204204803.GA31024@t...> <4203E349.9070803@k...> <cc159a4a0502041317af483be@m...> <4203E93A.1040302@k...> <cc159a4a05020413364d9b45c0@m...> <4203ED67.9090905@k...>
• Reply-to: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:47:19 -0800, Robert Koberg <rob@k...> wrote:
> Peter Hunsberger wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>Then why are you arguing?
> >
> >
> > Perhaps because I'm not so myopic to believe that my needs are true
> > for the rest of the universe of XML users, or then again, perhaps
> > because it's Friday afternoon and I'm getting tired from a week long
> > refactoring session...
> 
> This seems to be a thread about a wishlist (maybe I am wrong?).
> Diplomacy, at this stage, seems premature.

Heh heh: let them all drive dump trucks... 

I guess my wish list would have some sort of simple entity equivalent.
 That and peace, love and harmony for everyone.

-- 
Peter Hunsberger

• References:
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Previous by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread