• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:12:08 -0500
• Cc: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• In-reply-to: <42021486.30006@p...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0501280904130.20504-100000@s...> <200502032213.56841.david.lyon@c...> <42021486.30006@p...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Thursday 03 February 2005 07:09 am, Bill de hÓra wrote:

> "So I'm with Jim Gettys here, let's drain the swamp. XML might not be 
> perfect for this, but it's better than today's nonsensical mess."

Somebody has to drain the swamp, put up a parking lot, and charge
a buck and a half etc...

but seriously... 

I doubt that there would be too much of a problem keeping backwards
compatability with xml 1.0 in any new apis.

and there are a lot of people that say it's just green smelly water but
others that say "well it's a whole living eco-system..."...

David

-- 
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.

• References:
  • xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
  • Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W3C meeting in March [T2005020200AU]
• Next by Date: RE: Recommend A Java-XML Forum [T2005020200F1]
• Previous by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread