• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:58:31 -0500
• Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• In-reply-to: <87k6piyhpy.fsf@n...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0501280904130.20504-100000@s...> <200502080003.46645.david.lyon@c...> <87k6piyhpy.fsf@n...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Tuesday 08 February 2005 02:28 pm, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Recall that mixed content is identified with #PCDATA. Without
> consulting 8879, let me attempt to paraphrase. What does PCDATA stand
> for? "Parseable Character Data". And what is CDATA, "Character Data" that
> isn't parseable. The fact that it's locked inside the <![CDATA[ section
> means that noramally active characters (like & and <) are not active.

Ok, well then I think that CDATA it is an overly cumbersome mechanism
both to use and to explain. 

> |    <�客>
> |        �名&="Joe Schmoe"
> |        ��&="123 Seattle Ave"
> |        æ? æ??å­?&="]]>"
> |        æ??ç??æ? æ??å­?="^/ ^m (carriage return) ^t (tab) ^" (quote)"
> |    </�客>
> |
> | Proves what ?
>
> Uh, that you're looking at the document with a tool that doesn't
> understand utf-8 or utf-16. Why are you doing that?

It's all working fine at this end. I think you are mistaken but thanks
for your concern.

David

-- 
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.

• References:
  • Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
  • Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth comefrom?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth comefrom?
• Next by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth comefrom?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread