[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>,"Prakash Yamuna" <techpy@y...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:11:36 -0800
  • Thread-index: AcUV/ei1eCRsshPZSY+llP9DXvxQiQAAPH0gAAOHvQAAKwn3UA==
  • Thread-topic: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")

And if you pass it 

public class EmptySource implements Source{

	private String systemId = "http://www.example.com/myidentifier";


	public void setSystemId(String systemId){ this.systemId =
systemId; } 
	
	public String getSystemId(){ return this.systemId; }
}

what does it do? After all this class faithfully implements the Source
interface. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
There is always one more bug.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@s...] 
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:58 PM
To: Dare Obasanjo; 'Prakash Yamuna'; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Re:  What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re:
 Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")

> Translation: Source isn't any more useful than just using 
> java.lang.Object

There is one advantage. If you hand the transform() method a Date, or a
List, or a Gremlin, you will get a compile time type error. For me,
that's a good enough reason to invent a marker interface rather than
using Object.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member