• To: Razvan MIHAIU <mihaiu@m...>
• Subject: Re: DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type"anyType"
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:20:39 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., richard@i...,chiusano_joseph@b...
• In-reply-to: <E1D2vOd-0004dL-EC@s...>
• References: <E1D2vOd-0004dL-EC@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

Razvan MIHAIU wrote:
>     What about the reasons for this change ? Does it have anything to do
> with CDATA sections (as I suspect) ? Did they change it so that CDATA
> sections will be less useful ? I know that CDATA sections are even more
> general - you can have unescaped ampersands - practically any kind of
> markup except "]]" but the new type could replace CDATA sections in some
> circumstances.

No. The content still has to be well-formed XML. anyType doesn't mean 
anyThing.

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • [ANN] Five new utilities from Topologi
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType"
    • From: "Razvan MIHAIU" <mihaiu@m...>

• Prev by Date: A Business Analysts View: 3 XML Design Principles
• Next by Date: [ANN] Five new utilities from Topologi
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD element type "ANY" vs. XML Schema element type "anyType"
• Next by thread: [ANN] Five new utilities from Topologi
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread