• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:51:36 -0800
• In-reply-to: <f5bacq22m08.fsf@e...>
• References: <p06020406be3929f8cd23@[134.89.13.14]> <f5bacq22m08.fsf@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> It also seems likely to arise from a confusion between domain
> modelling with document design

For better or worse, these two now seem hopelessly confused.

Every time I hear somebody say, "Design in UML and generate your (XML, 
database, object, ...) schemas from UML," the response is a blank look 
followed by a request for a tool to generate database schemas, classes, 
Web services, etc. from XML Schemas. The tool writers (me included) have 
been only too happy to comply.

-- Ron

• References:
  • choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
    • From: John Graybeal <graybeal@m...>
  • Re: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by Date: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Articleon JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Previous by thread: Re: choice, sequence, all: 'easy' XML Schema question
• Next by thread: Why associate an attribute with a namespace ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread