[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>,"Elliotte Harold" <elharo@m...>
  • Subject: RE: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:17:30 -0800
  • Cc: "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@e...>,"XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
  • Thread-index: AcUNiHQPu451Z/SjQ6O/EY1NEn5bUwAA7avw
  • Thread-topic: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Foster [mailto:bob@o...] 
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:46 PM
> To: Elliotte Harold
> Cc: Robin Berjon; XML Developers List
> Subject: Re:  Re: Where does the "nothing left but 
> toolkits" myth come from?
> 
>
> So if one called it BML and wrote SAX and DOM APIs to read 
> and write it, you'd be happy with it?

I don't understand this obsession with SAX and DOM. As APIs go they both
[expletive deleted][0,1]. Why would anyone come up with a simplified binary format then
decide to cruft it up by layering a crufty XML API on it is beyond me. 

[0]
http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/archives/2005/01/31/sax-the-bad-
the-good-and-the-controversial/
[1] http://www.artima.com/intv/dom.html


--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
New systems generate new problems.   

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member