• To: lists@j...
• Subject: Re: An unclear point with W3C XML 1.0 Specification
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:07:52 -0800
• Cc: collin@w..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <41DCD3FE.3050806@j...>
• References: <20050106042113.CF2B828C04D@m...> <41DCD3FE.3050806@j...>
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

>> ___Note that a SystemLiteral can be
>> parsed without scanning for markup.___

> I am babbling... 

New years resolution... read more carefully. My explanation was a good 
explanation (perhaps) of EntityLiterals or Literals in general. It was a 
terrible terrbile horrible description of what happens with a 
SystemLiteral.

*sigh*

Apologies...
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • An unclear point with W3C XML 1.0 Specification
    • From: "Collin Hsu" <collin@w...>
  • Re: An unclear point with W3C XML 1.0 Specification
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
• Next by Date: RE: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
• Previous by thread: Re: An unclear point with W3C XML 1.0 Specification
• Next by thread: Re: An unclear point with W3C XML 1.0 Specification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread