[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:10:21PM -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I suspect the answer will be classes of binaries of which, one 
> or two dominate the runway.

It's possible, in which case the next question whether we (W3C) could
(or should) develop a framework and/or best practices guide. A framework
might end up being ways to use HTTP content negotiation, and ways to
parse XML from an HTTP session saved as a local file, to give a wild
example, with the goal that even if a processor couldn't handle a
particular document, at least it'd know why, and maybe could
delegate conversion in a predictable way.

That sort of decision is beyond the mandate of the current
Working Group, but (as Rich pointed out) they are providing
the necessary background information.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member