• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: ANN: RSS 1.1
• From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:45:46 -0500
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=PJKFLf6U82HW4KFAxJTlj0c8JEXr/3EZY5TYJm5NkUn0LpjpTCtLNHqZmOlMqJiBMINJcFHBnS3xHLJO3iMCPyVIAFB3fJGuC66gBtupiRtp7JsJ6idNKqWiDUQGcK24v2yDrYCJS41QjikoINtD3dYRaMPnyHGdcCRDAg6Cs7U=
• In-reply-to: <41ED1D5A.7070909@i...>
• References: <41ED1D5A.7070909@i...>
• Reply-to: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:29:46 +0000, Sean B. Palmer
<sean+rss@i...> wrote:

> This specification has been developed by a group of RSS 1.0 users
> including myself who sought not just to resolve the various bugs therein
> but also to improve the integrity of the specification in general, and
> provide RELAX NG and RDF Schemata.

Thanks for the announcement.  Those of us who don't belong to the
rss-dev group would be grateful for a bit of history.  What made you
decide to make another RSS fork?  Is the rss-dev group responsible for
RSS 1.x inactive or unresponsive, or are there some fundamental
architectural disagreements?
 

Thanks, and all the best,


David

-- 
http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: RSS 1.1
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean+rss@i...>

• References:
  • ANN: RSS 1.1
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean+rss@i...>

• Prev by Date: Announce: 1060 NetKernel v2.0.2 - XML Application Server
• Next by Date: expat question: reading DTD
• Previous by thread: ANN: RSS 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: RSS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread