• To: Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...>
• Subject: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:59:27 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200501171558.02884.frans.englich@t...>
• Mail-followup-to: Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...>,xml-dev@l...
• References: <20050116220239.GB10592@m...> <41EBD871.7000806@w...> <20050117153547.GA17990@m...> <200501171558.02884.frans.englich@t...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...> [2005-01-17 10:54]:
> On Monday 17 January 2005 15:35, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> > * Karl Waclawek <karl@w...> [2005-01-17 10:23]:
> > > Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> > > >* Karl Waclawek <karl@w...> [2005-01-17 09:16]:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >     I'm looking at Saxon, Jaxon, and Xalan, and they all have a
> >     different Java language binding for XPath, which is annoying for
> >     me as an application developer.
> 
> Isn't the proper solution for that to adopt the DOM XPath API?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-DOM-Level-3-XPath-20040226/

    No, the other way round. XPath to target language.
   
    That's not in the XPath API, unless I'm totally missing something.

--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@e...

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • XPattern Specification
    • From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>
  • Re: XPattern Specification
    • From: Karl Waclawek <karl@w...>
  • XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>
  • Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Next by Date: Re: XPattern Specification
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Next by thread: RE: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread