• To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Subject: Re: Embedded-Grammar&Components Design Approach [Was: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?]
• From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:26:56 -0600
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=tjxMair4HBENXFKKK5qqx3FijQ/4XFC6BizGGQwyRmipuKcQnQUYjAepTyB6TVrnNxlS1gdTIUV9vJ50EzRSEd4/27ZmSjY1XRb08JX1W0P7GL3ubYxpAQe7sHhsZXLV+LY8LsgmBC3AqaEb8pzYw1k7VK+pj7c5aqchnxo4jYY=
• In-reply-to: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F45176811@M...>
• References: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F45176811@M...>
• Reply-to: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:21:02 -0500, Chiusano Joseph
<chiusano_joseph@b...> wrote:

> Embedded-Grammar&Components approach = RDF?

That was certainly my first thought....  

<snip/>

-- 
Peter Hunsberger

• References:
  • RE: Embedded-Grammar&Components Design Approach [Was: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?]
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPattern Specification
• Next by Date: Re: XPattern Specification
• Previous by thread: RE: Embedded-Grammar&Components Design Approach [Was: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?]
• Next by thread: RE: Embedded-Grammar&Components Design Approach [Was: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread