• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
• From: Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@v...>
• Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:38:25 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2339.66.57.24.44.1104641044.squirrel@66.57.24.44>
• References: <1104612604.3038.168.camel@borgia> <1783.66.57.24.44.1104631405.squirrel@66.57.24.44> <1104633255.3038.209.camel@borgia> <2092.66.57.24.44.1104637304.squirrel@66.57.24.44> <20050101232838.546cb9a8.amyzing@t...> <2339.66.57.24.44.1104641044.squirrel@66.57.24.44>

On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 23:44 -0500, hhalpin@i... wrote:

> 1) Are type systems needed really? Seems there quite a few people which
>    think the answer is no, and I would say *sometimes*.

In XML?  Why?  Why must the interpretation of strings be constrained at
the level of the formalism itself?

• References:
  • Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
    • From: hhalpin@i...
  • Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
    • From: hhalpin@i...
  • Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
    • From: hhalpin@i...

• Prev by Date: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
• Next by Date: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
• Previous by thread: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
• Next by thread: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread