• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
• From: Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@v...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:14:43 -0500
• In-reply-to: <32878.68.242.36.87.1104909093.squirrel@68.242.36.87>
• References: <1104886621.4359.241.camel@borgia> <32878.68.242.36.87.1104909093.squirrel@68.242.36.87>

On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 02:11 -0500, hhalpin@i... wrote:
> Then, it seems at least as XML is concerned, is that those of us who
> think typing is useful (albeit a small minority on this list) would
> like to see some good, extensible type system (although no-one seems
> to have any good ideas on this list)

Time to reinvent notations, perhaps badly.

• References:
  • RE: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • RE: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
    • From: hhalpin@i...

• Prev by Date: Inline data typing
• Next by Date: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: Streaming XML)
• Previous by thread: RE: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
• Next by thread: Re: The Airplane Example (was Re: StreamingXML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread