• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• From: PA <petite.abeille@g...>
• Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:27:47 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:return-path:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=kktlgDrWST3RpXjd9RELGyZPd8vcQe+Ud+019DUkcKcY1Q7oQpIpPxdW1HlZMUKlX0A9s3yVfrC/sxWD/zztW8tK1+8voRCQRTlwuLLQHRhA8nUi5SzvI0BOCB9k0ktzplEnmwCl0KmbwBdrmVCS9nTzs9tLEavL0w1kKqrH0w8=
• In-reply-to: <E1Cctu1-0006fh-00@u...>
• References: <E1Cctu1-0006fh-00@u...>

On Dec 11, 2004, at 00:10, Michael Kay wrote:

>> Is there a more or less "agreed upon" scheme to define a map type
>> structure in XML?
>
> No.

Bummer :/

I would have thought that such a structure would have been pretty 
common by now, no?

> I tend to use <entry key="key">value</entry> probably because it uses 
> only
> two names and I have trouble thinking of names.

I see.

In my case, keys can be of any type, so I'm not quite sure if using an 
element attribute would work...

How would I express the following if using element attributes?

<map>
     <entry>
	    <key>
		    <collection>
			    <string>Compound</string>
			    <string>Key</string>
		    </collection>
	    </key>
	    <value>
		    <integer>101</integer>
	    </value>
     </entry>
</map>

Thanks!

Cheers,

PA.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • RE: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Next by Date: Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Previous by thread: RE: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Next by thread: Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread