• To: PA <petite.abeille@g...>
• Subject: Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:17:54 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <963D6A32-4D0B-11D9-9157-000393760B7E@g...>
• References: <677FA140-4AF7-11D9-9B09-000393760B7E@g...> <FE526FC7-4BC0-11D9-B7D9-000A95A51C9E@t...> <7380ED90-4D07-11D9-9157-000393760B7E@g...> <41BD9596.8010200@m...> <963D6A32-4D0B-11D9-9157-000393760B7E@g...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

PA wrote:

> Ok. Why would relying on such relationships be a "bad" thing though? 
> What are the benefits of introducing an <entry> tag in the <dict> 
> structure?

1. Most APIs/languages/tools such as XSLT can much more conveniently 
operate on the parent-child relationship than the sibling relationship.

2. It's more extensible. For instance, you could extend the entry 
approach to include multi-valued keys and valueless keys quite easily.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: PA <petite.abeille@g...>

• References:
  • [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: PA <petite.abeille@g...>
  • Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: PA <petite.abeille@g...>
  • Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
    • From: PA <petite.abeille@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Next by Date: RE: XML Vocabularies for Large Systems - 3 Philosophica lly Different Approaches
• Previous by thread: RE: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Next by thread: Re: [newbie] Mapping a Map 101?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread