• To: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT syntax (was: Re: What niche is XQuerytargeting?)
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 16:48:38 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0412081842550.458@r...>
• References: <A3ACB376-48E0-11D9-85AB-000393DC762C@m...> <E1CbyBV-0007Wy-00@u...> <cp7o9k$29g$1@s...> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0412081842550.458@r...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 19:10 -0500, Vladimir Gapeyev wrote:
> So, according to the previous posts, there are valid reasons for having
> XML-based XSLT syntax, and for having a more humane variant.
> 
> Question: why can't this be the case, so that we enjoy the benefits of
> both?  I.e. why can't we have two isomorphic syntaxes for XSLT, both
> blessed by a standards body --- similar to the two syntaxes for RelaxNG.
Intriguing idea Vladimir.

Would anyone like to guess how the ideas of relax-ng might map onto
XSLT?

regards DaveP
-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
    • From: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@m...>
  • RE: What niche is XQuery targeting?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
    • From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>
  • Re: XSLT syntax (was: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?)
    • From: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• Next by Date: ROR - Resources of a Resource
• Previous by thread: RE: XSLT syntax (was: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?)
• Next by thread: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread