• To: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Subject: Re: XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
• From: david.lyon@c...
• Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:30:18 +1100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <41B34658.2010106@r...>
• References: <009801c4d941$ad985600$6501a8c0@dell8100> <20041203201954.25440.qmail@w...> <e3a5cb2c0412031223645b7858@m...> <41B14D45.8000902@r...> <1102141005.41b1564d2e661@65.39.203.11> <41B29521.9050505@r...> <1102240581.41b2db4577a3b@65.39.203.11> <41B34658.2010106@r...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6

Ron,

> I'm sure I'll get grilled for this, but to my mind, XML grids, XML
> pipelines, whatever glues SOAs together, and similar systems are all of
> a feather. The important characteristics (in my mind) are that the glue
> is configurable by the developer and that the applications don't realize
> they are being linked together. Note that the first characteristic
> excludes a single, custom glue application, although that is certainly
> related.

Obviously you see yourself as a knight of the old code...


David


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

• References:
  • XML Pipeline
    • From: "Stephen E. Beller" <sbeller@n...>
  • Re: XML Pipeline
    • From: Christopher Milton <cmiltonperl@y...>
  • Re: XML Pipeline
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: XML Pipeline
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: XML Pipeline
    • From: david.lyon@c...
  • Re: XML Pipeline
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
    • From: david.lyon@c...
  • Re: XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Pipeline
• Next by Date: Re: Re: XML Pipeline
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Pipeline vs an XML Grid
• Next by thread: Re: XML Pipeline
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread