[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Michael Kay wrote:

> You can argue that the equivalent syntax in XSLT is very cumbersome, but
> that only becomes a problem if you're doing heavy joins, and I very rarely
> see applications that need that: in XML 90% of the relationships tend to be
> within the hierarchy, so you use the XPath axes rather than value-based
> joins. 

Some common reasons I have seen for doing lots of joins: references 
among web pages (especially in mailing list archives!), ATOM or RSS 
feeds, joins among XML views of relational tables, correlation data from 
several hierarchies to create a different representation...

If every set of data had only one sensible hierarchical relationship, we 
wouldn't wind up doing so much joins and restructuring.

Jonathan

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member