[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote: > You can argue that the equivalent syntax in XSLT is very cumbersome, but > that only becomes a problem if you're doing heavy joins, and I very rarely > see applications that need that: in XML 90% of the relationships tend to be > within the hierarchy, so you use the XPath axes rather than value-based > joins. Some common reasons I have seen for doing lots of joins: references among web pages (especially in mailing list archives!), ATOM or RSS feeds, joins among XML views of relational tables, correlation data from several hierarchies to create a different representation... If every set of data had only one sensible hierarchical relationship, we wouldn't wind up doing so much joins and restructuring. Jonathan
|

Cart



