• To: sterling <sstouden@t...>
• Subject: Re: XML-aware programming language?
• From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:37:24 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=TTAlNUb2NdLx5YluvmHqzUid+TvWfiVfvvjOYlXZ7lFxDXVFgCT+2gHkhIawTYEwjEX60ZYwdgK01hdP/JITzQ5xGVcMLsB6Hazs2iPcOypZ7FMJgiUhBFGqNzsLq6dUzwH1fr/lVnUupMRinbLb58oFQ82GqsS3dnXVn5SFQ7U=
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0412132227280.14574-100000@d...>
• References: <E1CZn6F-0000ij-00@u...> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0412132227280.14574-100000@d...>
• Reply-to: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:39:48 -0600 (CST), sterling
<sstouden@t...> wrote:
> 
> This thread suggests a really big demand for one single
> language (maybe layered into levels suitable to different
> types of applications.)
> Such a language would need to provide for all
> syntax and grammar necessary to apply all known logic
> to all types of processing at all levels of the
> programming to application interface.
> 
> Would it be productive to detail the deficiencies of all
> languages in comparative format. They try to use that list
> to create the requirements for a standard language?  I know,
> this would be a great big project, but it would make the
> net and and everything connected with it more accessible
> to more people.

Everyone run, head for the hills, the ghosts of Ada are haunting us....

-- 
Peter Hunsberger

• References:
  • RE: XML-aware programming language?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: XML-aware programming language?
    • From: sterling <sstouden@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• Next by Date: RE: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML-aware programming language?
• Next by thread: Re: XML-aware programming language?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread