• To: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>
• Subject: Re: XML-aware programming language?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:35:54 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, 'Joe English' <jenglish@f...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <41B0482F.1030305@e...>

> >>This preserves the semantics according to [REC-xml-names] --
> >>it's the namespace URI that's important, not the prefix --

As long as you don't care about things like digital signatures.

If you do, one way to address this is to come up with another
canonicalization scheme.
	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Re: XML-aware programming language?
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: output node with subnodes "as-is"
• Next by Date: RE: XML-aware programming language?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML-aware programming language?
• Next by thread: Re: XML-aware programming language?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread