[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


I agree - the XPath/XQuery/XSLT is a good data model, and I would pick 
the same one.

Jonathan

Daniela Florescu wrote:
>> Tim's point was that you couldn't have a native XML programming 
>> language because there is no data model for XML. Fact is, there are 
>> many. Pick one.
> 
> I picked mine Jonathan. The XQuery and XSLT Data Model.
> 
> It's the only one among all possibilities that satisfies ALL my 
> requirements:
> 
> 1) be an abstract data model, not an API that implies a certain data
> access pattern
> 2) cover the entire Infoset
> 3) cover schema validated as well as non schema validated data
> 4) be usable
> 5) have at least one data processing language based on it
>       (there are actually three: XPath 2.0, XQuery and XSLT 2.0)
> 6) show evidence that it can be implemented
> 7) co-exist peacefully with the other XML data models
> 

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member