[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I agree - the XPath/XQuery/XSLT is a good data model, and I would pick the same one. Jonathan Daniela Florescu wrote: >> Tim's point was that you couldn't have a native XML programming >> language because there is no data model for XML. Fact is, there are >> many. Pick one. > > I picked mine Jonathan. The XQuery and XSLT Data Model. > > It's the only one among all possibilities that satisfies ALL my > requirements: > > 1) be an abstract data model, not an API that implies a certain data > access pattern > 2) cover the entire Infoset > 3) cover schema validated as well as non schema validated data > 4) be usable > 5) have at least one data processing language based on it > (there are actually three: XPath 2.0, XQuery and XSLT 2.0) > 6) show evidence that it can be implemented > 7) co-exist peacefully with the other XML data models >
|

Cart



