• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:11:49 +0200
• Cc: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>, Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>,XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <41BF11F7.5030805@d...>
• Organization: Multiconn Technologies
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1027671F0@R...> <41BF11F7.5030805@d...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803

Jonathan Robie wrote:

> FUD alert. You are right when you say that implementation is 
> non-trivial. Not everyone can write such an implementation. But it's not 
> hard to use such an implementation.

That reminds me "the right thing" from the "Worse is Better" paper[1].
What's the worse-is-better thing that is going to win here?

[1] http://www.naggum.no/worse-is-better.html
-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

• References:
  • RE: What niche is XQuery targeting?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Query decomposition [was: What niche is XQuery targeting?]
• Next by Date: [xsd] Schema in multiple documents
• Previous by thread: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• Next by thread: RE: What niche is XQuery targeting?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread