Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 07:58:39 +1100, david.lyon@c... <david.lyon@c...> wrote: > > Hmm... good point.... > > Given the choice I personally prefer the optimisation > route.. > > It only takes one user to come along and do a comparison > of how slow or fast it happens, work out the truth that > the parsers are crap... and then people look stupid > don't they. Nope, I don't use crap, I use Saxon... > > That's why I do believe there is space for efficient > parsers. I use speed optimised parsers. But before > they were optimised, they did struggle with big files > and lot's of data. > > I'm a speed freak... just cannot help it.. > > bring on the assembly language subroutines... There's a place for everything, but I'll perform no optimization before it is shown necessary. Bottlenecks rarely showup where you expect them. -- Peter Hunsberger
|
